<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Report</title>
<link href="http://dspace.daffodilvarsity.edu.bd:8080/handle/123456789/9430" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://dspace.daffodilvarsity.edu.bd:8080/handle/123456789/9430</id>
<updated>2026-04-05T17:30:14Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-05T17:30:14Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>The Transformation of Academic Labor: Past as Prologue at the UC</title>
<link href="http://dspace.daffodilvarsity.edu.bd:8080/handle/123456789/9431" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Feldblum, Sammy</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Schmidt, John</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Khan, Fariha</name>
</author>
<id>http://dspace.daffodilvarsity.edu.bd:8080/handle/123456789/9431</id>
<updated>2023-01-19T21:00:40Z</updated>
<published>2022-02-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Transformation of Academic Labor: Past as Prologue at the UC
Feldblum, Sammy; Schmidt, John; Khan, Fariha
1. The University of California has experienced a long-term decline in state funding&#13;
over the last forty years and persistent enrollment growth in the same period. Per-student spending has been allowed to substantially decline as a result.&#13;
2. State funding of higher education is historically subject to high levels of volatility.&#13;
This volatility has been exacerbated by recurrent political and economic crises and&#13;
competition for increasingly scarce state resources.&#13;
3. Successive policy decisions at the state and university level have created a situation&#13;
in which an increasing proportion of the UC’s core revenues come from student&#13;
tuition, fees, and private philanthropy, which are themselves subject to political&#13;
pressures.&#13;
4. Though the Master Plan for Higher Education was premised on the assumption that&#13;
both the teaching and research missions of the university were essential for it to&#13;
function as a public good, the two have become decoupled. An increasing proportion&#13;
of the teaching conducted by the university is performed by contingent and nontenured faculty (“lecturers”) with limited job security and little or no role in faculty&#13;
governance.&#13;
5. The growth of lecturers has outpaced the growth of tenure-track faculty at the UC in&#13;
9 of the last 10 years, and the growth of part-time positions among these lecturers&#13;
has likewise outpaced the growth of full-time positions in the same period.&#13;
6. Compared to tenure-line faculty, this workforce is cheap and flexible and has come&#13;
to occupy a position of structural importance to the university’s core functions – but&#13;
evidence suggests this flexibility hurts student retention and performance.
</summary>
<dc:date>2022-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
