DSpace Repository

Comparative Evaluation of Condylar Guidance Angles Measured Using Arcon and Non-Arcon Articulators and Panoramic Radiographs—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Aljohani, Amjad Obaid
dc.contributor.author Sghaireen, Mohammed Ghazi
dc.contributor.author Abbas, Muhammad
dc.contributor.author Alzarea, Bader Kureyem
dc.contributor.author Srivastava, Kumar Chandan
dc.contributor.author Shrivastava, Deepti
dc.contributor.author Issrani, Rakhi
dc.contributor.author Mathew, Merin
dc.contributor.author Alsharari, Ahmed Hamoud L
dc.contributor.author Alsharari, Mohammed Ali D.
dc.contributor.author Aljunaydi, Naif Abdulrahman
dc.contributor.author Alanazi, Saif
dc.contributor.author Alsharari, Mosheri Muslem S.
dc.contributor.author Alam, Mohammad Khursheed
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-06T10:30:52Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-06T10:30:52Z
dc.date.issued 2023-06-08
dc.identifier.issn 2075-1729
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.daffodilvarsity.edu.bd:8080/handle/123456789/12282
dc.description.abstract The condylar guidance value (CGV) measurement constitutes an important part of a holistic prosthodontic treatment plan, with horizontal CGVs (HCGVs) and lateral CGVs (LCGVs) being two of the most prominently recognized. This systematic review aimed at evaluating the efficacy of two different types of CGV measurement protocols—articulators (both arcon and non-arcon) and panoramic radiographs. Additionally, it attempts to determine which of the mentioned methods performs better across several parameters. Several important web databases were searched using search terms derived from medical subject headings (MeSH), using keywords linked to “Arcon articulator”, “Condylar guidance angle”, “non-arcon articulator”, “Panoramic x-ray” and “Radiographic examination”, which constituted the first step in the study selection strategy. After completion, the search strategy which initially turned up to 831 papers, eventually ended up with 13 studies. The review and subsequent meta-analysis revealed that panoramic radiographs had noticeably greater efficacy in terms of the CGVs as compared to the articulators in the majority of the studies. Within the articulators, the arcon types recorded slightly higher CGVs than the non-arcon variety owing to the precision of jaw movement simulation in the former. However, further studies are required to validate these findings and establish more precise guidelines for the use of CGV measurement protocols in prosthodontic practice. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher MDPI Publications en_US
dc.subject Temporomandibular joint en_US
dc.subject Radiographic examination en_US
dc.subject Industrial radiography en_US
dc.title Comparative Evaluation of Condylar Guidance Angles Measured Using Arcon and Non-Arcon Articulators and Panoramic Radiographs—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account

Statistics