DSpace Repository

Credit Card Fraud Detection

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Tasnim, Nazia
dc.date.accessioned 2025-09-02T08:14:18Z
dc.date.available 2025-09-02T08:14:18Z
dc.date.issued 2024-01-27
dc.identifier.citation CIS en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.daffodilvarsity.edu.bd:8080/handle/123456789/14203
dc.description Project en_US
dc.description.abstract This thesis focuses on building a machine learning model for detecting fraud in credit card transactions using a data set consisting of 100,000 transactions with 92,785 non-fraudulent and 7,192 fraudulent instances containing information about each of the transactions along with their merchant group or demographics information. The paper tackles imbalanced data problems using Extra Trees, Random Forests, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Logistic Regression machine learning models. The ensemble methods, Trees and Random Performed had 96.87% highest accuracy with precision, recall, and balanced F1 score (Score). when it comes to classifying fraud transactions among all of the models, it is also noticed that KNN had a fairly good performance with an accuracy of 96.29%, being only slightly lower than the ensemble model results. The bestperforming model was the SVM (94.32% detection rate accuracy) and the worst one, but a really good performer in terms of complexity (the simpler model had 91.04% accuracy) was logistic regression. This study showcases the power of ensemble methods in the management of imbalanced data, offering high accuracies without sacrificing balance in performance metrics. The ensemble of Extra Trees, Random Forest, and KNN provided a trade-off between effectiveness and reliability making it the best choice to deploy in credit card fraud detection systems due to consistent and stable performance. These models could be improved in future work by applying deep learning techniques to represent more complex patterns, increasing the data set size with other types of transactions, and making use of synthetic data generated by generative models. In addition to offering real-time processing capabilities, so the system can analyze data as it comes in and detect anomalies more quickly, these techniques for detecting fraud should provide increased speed and accuracy. As such systems approach a production environment, compliance with data privacy rules like GDPR will be vital. It addresses fundamental differences between machine learning models and presents a thorough analysis to act as a guide in the choice of model for credit card fraud detection, thus laying the groundwork for future research. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship DIU en_US
dc.publisher DAFFODIL INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY en_US
dc.subject Data Mining en_US
dc.subject Credit Card en_US
dc.subject Fraud Detection en_US
dc.subject Machine Learning en_US
dc.subject Anomaly Detection en_US
dc.subject Predictive Modeling en_US
dc.title Credit Card Fraud Detection en_US
dc.type Other en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account