| dc.description.abstract |
This work is another step in the direction of state-of-the-art deep neural networks-based
robust handwritten signature verification. In the field of fraud detection and identity
verification, there is increasing need for robust authentication techniques, and so signature
verification becomes a key problem . In this paper, three of the most widely used deep
learning architectures are objectively analyzed on a well-known dataset to measure their
performance;
ResNet
50,Resnet50_Augmentation,
Inception
V3,MobileNet
V2,MobileNetV2_Augmentation.A systematic training and testing of models with
performance evaluation using metrics such as accuracy. The models were trained under a
common training procedure so that all results could be comparable. And after that we have
applied Data Augmentation in data set and trained these model again.The results show that
of the three models tested, ResNet 50 gives the best accuracy and claim the first place with
an accuracy of 98.21%, while Resnet50_Augmentation at second place give us a result with
an accuracy of 89.48% Inception V3 is 79.47%Inception_V3_Augmentation is 47.71 and
finally MobileNet V2 is in third place captured an new accuracies as well which was about
75.22%,MobileNetV2_Augmentation 67.29%. These results demonstrate the potential to
outperform the others, further illustrating ResNet 50 architecture's capability of tackling
handwriting signature complexity. Papers with code Significance The paper explains
effectiveness of different neural net architectures on a signature verification task. Based on
our conclusions we find that ResNet 50 is the highest performing in terms of Signature
Authentication and additionally believe this leaves potential future work for optimization
and use cases in realistic implementations |
en_US |