Comparison of Sewing Productivity Among Different Sewing Floors

Abstract

This project is the greatest important of any RMG industry. This paper represents the use of various tools and techniques for taming apparel sewing section efficiency throughout the production process. Now a day‟s apparel manufacturing industries are annoying to improve their current production system and situation and continuously looking for new production tools and techniques in order to keep quickness with the quick changes of trend in consumers of apparel products. There is no doubt that sewing section in an apparel industry is the most vital and teeming department that plays a vital role in the whole firm. In time study, Standard Minute Value has been calculated for each process or work. Here, by applying these systems significant progresses in the sewing section have been accomplished such as SMV, man power, bottle neck, capacity achievable, production/hr, performance rating, balance % and line efficiency. 1st day when compare O.F 3rd and N.F 4th floor, O.F 3rd become high SMV and complex process so production and efficiency% is low. O.F 3rd production 7664 pcs and efficiency 38%. 6th day when compare N.F 4th, N.F 6th and O.F 4th, here every floor SMV is same. Here SMV, production and efficiency% N.F 4th floor 11.67, 9750 pcs & 49%, N.F 6th 11.70, 10309 pcs & 51%, O.F 4th 11.40, 9435 pcs and 48%. If it should that here O.F 3rd SMV is low other two floor. None the less due to various factor in this floor production efficiency is comparatively low. Like- comparatively unskilled operator, improper line balancing, Delay cutting output, High non- productive time, alter % high, Machine break down etc. Initailly we know that if the SMV is low that‟s mean this process simply. So in this process prodution and efficiency is high but some factors proved that my concept was wrong. By the capasity study find out the bottle neck point, Accept to large quantity order, working sharing, proper layout, line balancing to helps ahcieved production and efficiency%.