DSpace Repository

Comparative Analysis of Chemical and Natural Admixture in Concrete

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ratu, Md Mahadi Hasan
dc.contributor.author Hossain, Md Shahadat
dc.contributor.author Trina, Nusrat Zahan
dc.contributor.author Hosen, Sarafat
dc.date.accessioned 2023-03-04T03:29:13Z
dc.date.available 2023-03-04T03:29:13Z
dc.date.issued 23-01-18
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.daffodilvarsity.edu.bd:8080/handle/123456789/9783
dc.description.abstract Concrete's compressive strength and splitting tensile strength are two major problems. This study investigates the use of natural and chemical admixtures to increase the compressive and splitting tensile strength of concrete and to make it more costeffective. In our project, concrete cylinders with and without admixtures are formed, and their compressive strength is assessed 7, 14, and 28 days after curing. The results of both concrete categories are contrasted. Investigating the increase in compressive and splitting tensile strength caused by chemical and natural admixture is the main goal of this study. In this thesis project, we prepared four sets of 18 cylinder samples each, for a total of 72 cylindrical samples. We followed the guidelines for ASTM standards when working on this project. We used the M20 standard concrete grade, and the mix ratio was 1:1.5:3. We used the same quantity of cement, coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, and w/c ratio in each sample. One set of these was created without the use of admixture, while the remaining three were created using two chemical and one natural admixture in the same quantity of 7.2 ml. We investigated the compressive and splitting tensile strengths following three cycles of curing for 7, 14, and 28 days. After 28 days, the compressive strength measured 2372 psi without admixture, 2969 psi with 7.2 ml of self-compacting admixture, 2707 psi with 7.2 ml of gram flour as admixture, and 3201 psi with 7.2 ml of gram flour (using 7.2 ml high strength admixture).After 28 days of curing, the splitting tensile strength measured 309 psi without admixture, 365 psi with 7.2 ml of self-compacting admixture, 348 psi with 7.2 ml of gram flour as an admixture, and 448 psi with 7.2 ml of gram flour (using 7.2 ml high strength admixture). Here the amount of used admixture was 1% of the used cement weight. The additional cost for chemical admixture is 1.1 taka per sample and for gram flour the cost is 0.5 taka per sample. Comparing all of resultswe can say that natural admixture (Gram flour) isa suitable alternative to chemical admixture comparing economicaleffectand strength. Throughout the thesis study, all codes and conducts were upheld in accordance with ASTM standard requirements.. Keywords Concrete,M20 Grade concrete PCC,Compressivestrength,Splitting tensile strength, en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Daffodil International University en_US
dc.subject Concrete en_US
dc.subject Concrete mixing en_US
dc.title Comparative Analysis of Chemical and Natural Admixture in Concrete en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account

Statistics