DSpace Repository

A Comparative Study of Performance Appraisal Systems of Two Private Commercial Banks

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Talukdar, Muhammad Bakhtear Uddin
dc.contributor.author Saha, Sampa
dc.date.accessioned 2012-11-11T09:02:58Z
dc.date.accessioned 2019-05-27T07:05:57Z
dc.date.available 2012-11-11T09:02:58Z
dc.date.available 2019-05-27T07:05:57Z
dc.date.issued 2007-01-01
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11948/587
dc.description.abstract Organizations need to evaluate their employees in a timely manner to determine the lack of rightwardness in the employees’ effort. By doing so an organization can reward its employees by giving promotion and other pecuniary and non-pecuniary benefits. On the contrary, it can punish its employees depending on some strict performance measuring criteria. This study tries to compare the performance appraisal system of a local bank with that of a multinational bank. Both banks are using quantitative and qualitative performance appraisal criteria. Although objective factors do matter, judgmental approach is widely used by both banks in their performance evaluation system. Immediate boss plays a significant role in deciding the fate of the appraisee. It has been seen that though there exists a good performance appraisal system in both cases, good amount of training and counseling still necessary for both the appraiser and the appraisee. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Daffodil International University en_US
dc.title A Comparative Study of Performance Appraisal Systems of Two Private Commercial Banks en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account

Statistics