DSpace Repository

The asymmetric influence of quadra-procyclicality on energy innovation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Lee, Chien-Chiang
dc.contributor.author Yahya, Farzan
dc.contributor.author Sultanuzzaman, Md Reza
dc.date.accessioned 2026-10-19T07:14:31Z
dc.date.available 2026-10-19T07:14:31Z
dc.date.issued 2026-02-01
dc.identifier.uri http://192.168.40.123:8080/handle/123456789/18169
dc.description Review en_US
dc.description.abstract The urgency of global climate commitments and sustainable energy transitions has elevated energy innovation to the forefront of economic policy discourse. Understanding the cyclical dynamics that shape energy innovation becomes critically important for effective policy design. This study examines the impact of quad-procyclicality encompassing fiscal, financial, energy consumption, and carbon emission procyclicality on energy innovation across 23 OECD countries from 2003 to 2022. Building on emerging evidence that economic cycles fundamentally alter innovation trajectories, we introduce a novel comprehensive framework that simultaneously considers four distinct but interconnected cyclical patterns. Energy innovation is crucial for addressing energy and climate-related challenges through the promotion of cleaner and more efficient technologies. Our cointegration analysis reveals long-run relationships between all types of procyclicality and energy innovation. While Driscoll-Kraay linear regression estimates indicate positive effects of all procyclicalities on energy innovation, panel quantile regression with non-additive fixed effects demonstrates that financial procyclicality is negatively associated with energy innovation. Moreover, the impact of quad-procyclicality is more pronounced at higher quantiles of innovation output. Our results further show that financial procyclicality decreases energy innovation by reducing financial efficiency. However, this negative effect can be mitigated by a stable financial system. These findings have profound implications for designing cycle-sensitive policies that maximize innovation outcomes while minimizing the adverse effects of economic volatility. Policymakers should implement targeted, cycle-sensitive strategies that leverage the positive effects of fiscal, energy consumption, and carbon emission procyclicality on energy innovation, while mitigating the negative impacts of financial procyclicality, particularly during economic expansions and for high-impact innovations. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Scopus en_US
dc.subject Energy innovation en_US
dc.subject Fiscal procyclicality en_US
dc.subject Carbon procyclicality en_US
dc.title The asymmetric influence of quadra-procyclicality on energy innovation en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account

Statistics